2-1-5 God Operationally Defined 0 Contents 2 Foundation 2-1 Postulates Postulates 2-1

2-1-6 The Aether And Einstein's Abstract Ignorance

 Introduction 0 Michelson - Morley experiment lacked insight. 1 Charged particle in a magnetic field error. 2 Materials 3 Apparatus Diagram 4 Procedure  (For Making Observations) 5 Observations 6 Analysis 7 Synthesis 8 Thesis 9 Discussion

Introduction

The mater, space and motion in which we live and move and have our being is what I operationally define as God!

The early mammoth hunting culture developed large boats to carry the tons of meet home often thousands of miles as mammoth bone homes down river show. This sailing culture sailed the seven seas leaving megalith markers to show this.

Knowing that the stars guided the ocean sailors, the sociopath manipulators of the affluent class in India made themselves astrologers and lied to say they could tell your fortune This class was conquered by Muslims around the years 900-1100 bc. Some escaped to Christian farm areas of Europe. We call them Gypsy or Roma.

Michelson - Morley experiment lacked insight.

In the background the lack of insight into the Michelson - Morley experiment that is the nature of photons being constructions of vortex rings (The True God particle) formed from God's eternal substance (the Aether) and swimming frictionless in the Aether.

Also, the Aether is being forced to hug the planet and move with it due to the shadow effect of earth in the ambient background shower of Aether motion (the same pressure which is the cause of  gravity).

Charged particle in a magnetic field error.

Then their is the error of misunderstanding of a charged particle in a magnetic field.

Magnetic Field:

First of all the magnetic field is essentially a construction of vortons prevented from collapsing by ferrite type bonds between atoms or by the stream of electrons tunneling through a conductor.

The charged particle is a collection of loops with the last photon caught in a loop with its tail extended spiraling out.

As the charged particles speed up there is a coupling factor where as the tail gets straighter it interacts less with the closed loops of the magnetic field.

Figure 4. Expected differential phase shift between light traveling the  longitudinal versus the transverse arms of the Michelson–Morley apparatus

 Click here to view a saved copy. mp4 The insanity of reasoning perfectly on a false assumption!

The insanity of reasoning perfectly on a false assumption!

logos noun

1. (often initial capital letter) Philosophy. the rational principle that governs and develops the universe.

2. Theology. the divine word or reason incarnate in Jesus Christ. John 1:1-14.

How to find who your true friends in Christ's spirit (Outlook) are, Just follow the Spirit Of Truth by becoming child like and say the truth of what you seem hear, touch, smell and taste; and say the truth of how you believe God's Laws (the Logos or Word of God) (God, In Whom we live and move and have our being) how God's Laws created us out of His eternal dirt!

Then say the Child development studies show every child needs a maternal mammalian nursing bond for the first 2 to 5 years and a home mother with direct child care responsibility with a respected father as head of household with the authority to see that wife and children respect the home and each other with the ability to confront and resolve error and ignorance. Don't be surprised if

xxx

A factor $\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}$ for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field is a dimensionless quantity that could be a factor in any of the physical entities present in the interaction of a particle of mass (m) and charge (-e) moving with a speed (v) in a magnetic field (B).

The purpose of section "1.6.0 Creation" is to lay a foundation for insight into the laws of nature, the laws of nature that are responsible caring and the laws that are the foundation for the potential for caring (see: 1.2 Levels of Caring and Response Ability.)

Hi Uncle Myles,

I'm working on the Foundation part of my website http://thewaythetruthandthelife.net/index/2_foundation/1-06_christs-spirit/1-6-00_postulates.htm

I am here in Russia with no one that speaks English but Olga. So it is hard for her to spend time with me to talk about Physics and the nature of physical reality. I called Bob but did not get an answer and thought of you. I looked for your phone number and I don't have it here so I am writing you.

I'm working on my website, I'm writing the discussion part at the section end. I'm getting into the problem of giving exact meaning to words by the need to operationally define them (which is the foundation for the great advancements from Galileo, Descartes and Newton). I have references to them in another section that is in the works. http://thewaythetruthandthelife.net/index/2_foundation/1-06_christs-spirit/1-6-22_sprit-of-truth-physical-science.htm

I see where the academic ignorance of action at a distance got its start with Newton's Inverse Square Law Of Gravity. But Newton knew that "action at a distance" was goofy! (1).

There is no vacuum. The sea of Aether (2) is where particles are formed from vortex rings of the Aether. Gravity is a shadow effect of Aether motion (imagine light having momentum and how light shining from all directions would push two objects together because of the shadow between them creating a relative pressure difference.

The Aether was rejected because of a misunderstanding of the Michelson-Morley Interferometer Experiment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment. Lorenz introduced the  beta factor $\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}$ to explain the change in length.(3)

I have Galileo, Descartes and Newton in my reference to scientists motivated by the Christian concepts of reality like "In God we live and move and have our being" and Jesus saying, "It is better I go away. (In His sacrifice removing the priesthood from between us and our source of existence [God]) I will send the Spirit Of Truth that will teach you all things and bring into mind what I have said."

How much of God's laws we had learned since your mother was born! When she was born there was no electricity, no cars, planes, rockets to the moon, they were just discovering chemistry and physics!

I have so much in the works due to revision from seeing clear that the process leaves much of my web site a mess. But taking the time to write this to you has helped me connect a few dots.

If you would not mind a call sometimes, please email me your phone number.

With care, Don

(1^) From http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis

3.2 Action at a distance

In the letters, Newton also responds to certain prominent reactions to the theory of gravity in the Principia. One of the most vexing issues raised by the theory is obviously the problem of action at a distance (Hesse 1961), and any interpretation of Newton's own understanding of this problem must account for his correspondence with Bentley. For instance, in a letter to Bentley from 1693, we find the following stark rejection of action at a distance, one that may be Newton's most famous pronouncement on the subject:

It is inconceivable that inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of something else which is not material, operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact…That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it (Janiak 2004, 102).

It appears that if accepting Newton's theory of gravity commits one to accepting action at a distance, Newton's sense of what counts as an intelligible cause of motion would be violated by his own theory.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2^) Luminiferous aether

In the picture below the parallel lines with arrows could represent light from a distant source but not the Aether.

The Aether is fragments of matter flying in all directions. To see how it travels through its self you can get an idea viewing the physics balls toy at

The luminiferous aether: it was hypothesised that the Earth moves through a "medium" of aether that carries light

In the late 19th century, luminiferous aether, æther or ether, meaning light-bearing aether, was the postulated medium for the propagation of light.[1]

Following the negative outcome of aether-drift experiments like the Michelson-Morley experiment, the concept of aether as a mechanical medium having a state of motion lost adherents. It has been replaced in modern physics by the  goofy  theory of relativity and quantum theory.

goofy     because the photon is leap frogging

Length contraction

A big challenge for this theory was the Michelson–Morley experiment in 1887. According to the theories of Fresnel and Lorentz a relative motion to an immobile ether had to be determined by this experiment, however, the result was negative. Michelson himself thought that the result confirmed the aether drag hypothesis, in which the aether is fully dragged by matter. However, other experiments like the Fizeau experiment and the effect of aberration disproved that model.

A possible solution came in sight, when in 1889 Oliver Heaviside derived from the Maxwell's equations that the magnetic vector potential field around a moving body is altered by a factor of $\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}$. Based on that result and to bring the hypothesis of an immobile ether in accordance with the Michelson–Morley experiment, George FitzGerald in 1889 (qualitatively) and independently of him Lorentz in 1892[A 2] (already quantitatively) suggested that not only the electrostatic fields, but also the molecular forces are affected in such a way that the dimension of a body in the line of motion is less by the value $\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}$ than the dimension perpendicularly to the line of motion. However, an observer co-moving with the earth would not notice this contraction, because all other instruments contract at the same ratio. In 1895[A 1] Lorentz proposed three possible explanation for this relative contraction:[B 3]

• The body contracts in the line of motion and preserves its dimension perpendicularly to it.

• The dimension of the body remains the same in the line of motion, but it expands perpendicularly to it.

• The body contracts in the line of motion, and expands at the same time perpendicularly to it.

Although the possible connection between electrostatic and intermolecular forces was used by Lorentz as a plausibility argument, the contraction hypothesis was soon considered as purely ad hoc. It is also important that this contraction only affected the space between the electron but not the electrons themselves, therefore the name "intermolecular hypotheses" was sometimes used of this effect. The so-called Length contraction without expansion perpendicularly to the line of motion and by the precise value $\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}$ (where l0 is the length at rest in the ether) was given by Larmor in 1897 and by Lorentz in 1904. In the same year Lorentz also argued that also electrons themselves are affected by this contraction.[B 4] For further development of this concept, see the section #Lorentz transformation.[A 3]

(2) Aether drag hypothesis

In the 19th century, the theory of the luminiferous aether as the hypothetical medium for the propagation of light was widely discussed. An important part of this discussion was the question concerning the state of motion of Earth with respect to this medium. The aether drag hypothesis dealt with the question whether the luminiferous aether is dragged by or entrained within moving matter. According to the first variant no relative motion exists between Earth and aether; according to the second one, relative motion exists and thus the speed of light should depend on the speed of this motion ("aether wind"), which should be measurable by instruments at rest on Earth's surface. Specific aether models were invented by Augustin-Jean Fresnel who in 1818 proposed that the aether is partially entrained by matter. The other one was proposed by George Stokes in 1845, in which the aether is completely entrained within or in the vicinity of matter.

While Fresnel's almost stationary theory was apparently confirmed by the Fizeau experiment (1851), Stokes' theory was apparently confirmed by the Michelson-Morley experiment (1881, 1887). This contradictory situation was resolved by the works of Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (1895, 1904) whose Lorentz ether theory banished any form of aether dragging, and finally with the work of Albert Einstein (1905) whose theory of special relativity doesn't contain the aether as a mechanical medium at all. [1] [2] [3]

(3^Basic concept]

This theory, which was developed mainly between 1892 and 1906 by Lorentz and Poincaré, was based on the aether theory of Augustin-Jean Fresnel, Maxwell's equations and the electron theory of Rudolf Clausius.[B 1] Lorentz introduced a strict separation between matter (electrons) and ether, whereby in his model the ether is completely motionless, and it won't be set in motion in the neighborhood of ponderable matter. As Max Born later said, it was natural (though not logically necessary) for scientists of that time to identify the rest frame of the Lorentz ether with the absolute space of Isaac Newton.[B 2] The condition of this ether can be described by the electric field E and the magnetic field H, where these fields represent the "states" of the ether (with no further specification), related to the charges of the electrons. Thus an abstract electromagnetic ether replaces the older mechanistic ether models. Contrary to Clausius, who accepted that the electrons operate by actions at a distance, the electromagnetic field of the ether appears as a mediator between the electrons, and changes in this field can propagate not faster than the speed of light. Lorentz theoretically explained the Zeeman effect on the basis of his theory, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1902. Joseph Larmor found a similar theory simultaneously, but his concept was based on a mechanical ether. A fundamental concept of Lorentz's theory in 1895[A 1] was the "theorem of corresponding states" for terms of order v/c. This theorem states that a moving observer with respect to the aether can use the same electrodynamic equations as an observer in the stationary aether system, thus they are making the same observations.

Length contraction

A big challenge for this theory was the Michelson–Morley experiment in 1887. According to the theories of Fresnel and Lorentz a relative motion to an immobile ether had to be determined by this experiment, however, the result was negative. Michelson himself thought that the result confirmed the aether drag hypothesis, in which the aether is fully dragged by matter. However, other experiments like the Fizeau experiment and the effect of aberration disproved that model.

A possible solution came in sight, when in 1889 Oliver Heaviside derived from the Maxwell's equations that the magnetic vector potential field around a moving body is altered by a factor of $\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}$. Based on that result and to bring the hypothesis of an immobile ether in accordance with the Michelson–Morley experiment, George FitzGerald in 1889 (qualitatively) and independently of him Lorentz in 1892[A 2] (already quantitatively) suggested that not only the electrostatic fields, but also the molecular forces are affected in such a way that the dimension of a body in the line of motion is less by the value $\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}$ than the dimension perpendicularly to the line of motion. However, an observer co-moving with the earth would not notice this contraction, because all other instruments contract at the same ratio. In 1895[A 1] Lorentz proposed three possible explanation for this relative contraction:[B 3]

• The body contracts in the line of motion and preserves its dimension perpendicularly to it.

• The dimension of the body remains the same in the line of motion, but it expands perpendicularly to it.

• The body contracts in the line of motion, and expands at the same time perpendicularly to it.

Although the possible connection between electrostatic and intermolecular forces was used by Lorentz as a plausibility argument, the contraction hypothesis was soon considered as purely ad hoc. It is also important that this contraction only affected the space between the electron but not the electrons themselves, therefore the name "intermolecular hypotheses" was sometimes used of this effect. The so-called Length contraction without expansion perpendicularly to the line of motion and by the precise value $\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}$ (where l0 is the length at rest in the ether) was given by Larmor in 1897 and by Lorentz in 1904. In the same year Lorentz also argued that also electrons themselves are affected by this contraction.[B 4] For further development of this concept, see the section #Lorentz transformation.[A 3]

When Olga saw your work and interest in how things work, she said, "Now I know where you get it from (The Pelton Blood).

But having failed two years and quitting after the first week of 9th grade, I think it came from building pig pens and chicken coops before my brain got corrupted with what they are teaching in the Universities today.

Their "big bang" came from eating beans and the warped time and space came from warped minds.

Now children are indoctrinated with these "SCIENTIFIC" book and they believe it because there early brain development was corrupted and they are like little Muslims that have memorized Sura 9 and will strap on a bomb to kill them selves and others out of faith in what they were taught before they could think for themselves.

What a joy to teach Physics by Investigation. I had class sizes of 14 or 18 and they worked in pairs. What a joy to watch their joy as they discovered and asked for the math skill to analyze their observations!

xx

xx

Materials

xx

Apparatus Diagram

xx

Procedure (For Making Observations)

xx

Observations

xx

Analysis

xx

Synthesis

xx

Thesis

PS: I see that Bob returned my call but it is the middle of the night now and I would wake Olga by making a call. She needs her sleep as we are raising a 4 year old granddaughter (Darina) and Olga needs her rest to care for her.

Donald J. Johnson Sr.

• Paul said, "Faith is the substance of things hoped for. the evidence of things unseen!"

But he also said, "In God we live and move and have our being."

Jesus said, "It is better I go away. I will send the Spirit of Truth and It will teach you all things..."

Don said, "When your mother (my Grandma) was born, they did not have cars, electricity, planes, rockets, or atomic bombs. Look how much of ...God's laws we have learned by the Spirit of Truth!

When I was born (1939*) before women were raised in daycare and could bond with their children, autism was 1 in 2000. Now for boys in 2013 it is about 1 in 50 and for girls about 1 in 75. Except in the Amish it is still about 1 in 2000.

Maybe we need to learn some of God's laws of home making and mothering and father from the Amish.

*The war took women out of the home and there children don't know how to care much beyond "I want..." and "Look at me ..."

Now so many boys are raised in daycare they don't know or want to be a father, they just want feed the snake!

Maybe we can learn God's laws of raising children healthy and make it a punishable crime to violate a child's right to life and healthy child development, healthy enough to raise healthy children and defend our Christian value of honest caring homes rather than bottle feeding and daycare!"

Love and miss you, from Russia with care, Don

Discussion

The mater, space and motion in which we live and move and have our being is what I operationally define as God!

God's Culture (Soul) on earth is built first on Abraham in two founding points 1) There is One Most High Unseen God and 2) God does not want Child sacrifice!

Abraham saw it was foolish to Worship the Planet gods because they had the power to move among the other gods. It was foolish because there is a "Most High Unseen God" around Which all the visible world moves and it stands still in the center.

The Most High God Genesis 14:20 King James Bible

And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes Of all.

The Unseen God Colossians 11:15 King James Bible

Who (Christ Jesus) is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

John 1: (Word = logos = Gods Eternal Laws)

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4 ln him was life; and the life was the light 0f men.
5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
6 There was a man sent from God, Whose name was John.
7 The same came for a Witness, to bear Witness Of the Light, that all men might through him believe.

John 16

5 But now I go my way to him that sent me; and none of you asketh me, Whither goest thou?
6 But because I have said these things unto you, sorrow hath filled your heart.
7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;
10 Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;
11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.
12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.
13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, [that] shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.  14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew [it] unto you.
15 All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew [it] unto you
.